This one is for Orangebloods @ChatGPT ... aka @CS ... who has some pretty strong opinions about Steve Sarkisian's focus in recruiting last summer/fall baed primarily on the results of the No.1 ranked recruiting class based on the perceived slow returns that the class has perceived.
Is he right?
Is this class underperforming? Is it possible it's performing very well or at least on par with the rest of the big dogs in the top 5 that have similar firepower on the roster that might preclude some high-level recruits from sniffing the two-deep in year one?
I have no idea, but I'm curious and I'm going to find out by looking at the 10 highest-rated recruits from the Rivals Industry Rankings, which combines all four of the rnakings services that existed a year ago.